Search for: All records

Sustained power outages are growing in scale and number primarily due to i) the increasing number and intensity of disasters and ii) decarbonization- and electrification-related grid changes. Outage mitigation technologies (e.g., backup diesel generators, and solar panels) increasingly provide vital electricity access during disasters. However, their adoption is inequitable due to individual- or community-level barriers and historic underinvestment in certain communities. We postulate that community-based Resilience Hubs (RHs), which are being increasingly deployed to provide on-site services during disasters, can be expanded to address this inequity by supplying backup power to vulnerable communities through islanded operations. To that end, we present Grid-Aware Tradeoff Analysis (GATA) framework to identify the best backup power systems for expanded RHs. To include technical, economic, and social facets in the framework, we will use three-phase power flow (TPF) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). TPF will enforce the electrical feasibility of islanded RH operation, and MCDA will quantify the economic, environmental, and equity-weighted outage mitigation performance. As a use case for GATA, we will evaluate multiple representative RHs in Richmond, California, and highlight the non-dominated systems for the electrically feasible RHs. We show the value of GATA's detailed grid simulation, its ability to quantify tradeoffs across scenarios, and its possible extensions.